Breast Cancer and Fungus

by Doug A. Kaufmann

As you may recall, last year I wrote an article about the fungal link to breast cancer. In it, I reported that antibiotics and alcohol had been scientifically linked to breast cancer and I pointed out the interesting parallel between the two. As the years pass, I believe that science is becoming increasingly convinced that cancer has more to do with germs than spontaneous growth.

Why haven't they yet accepted my fungus germ theory to cancer? In my humble opinion, the problem involves semantics. There are far too many bacteriologists and virologists in human medical research and far too few mycologists (those who study fungus). Most of the mycologists that do exist are limited to studying pond scum and mushrooms and are never called upon to research the cancer-fungus link.

At the risk of confusing you, let me throw out a new word and see how it flows with the rest of this article: pleomorphism. A pleomorphic cell takes on two or more distinct forms during its life cycle.
This means that a simple bacterium may at some time in its life become a virus! Add to that definition the fact that errors occur in laboratories (viral versus bacterial diagnosis) and you have all the makings of a gross misunderstanding of the cause of cancer, if indeed cancer is caused by an infection. And it may well be. Consider these facts:

• Feline leukemia is caused by a virus
• H. pylori is a bacteria that causes stomach cancer
• Hepatitis B is a virus associated with liver cancer
• Human papilloma virus causes cervical cancer

Taking it one small step forward, and understanding that doctors consider fungal infections so irrelevant that they are not even reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), replace the above bulleted words "bacteria" and "viral" with the word "fungus." One small step for semantics, one huge step for mankind! Whereas bacteria and virus truly do not fit the stereotypical role in cancer, fungi fit perfectly on all counts.

As many of you know, I have documented this phenomenon in a series of books. If breast cancer is infectious, it certainly doesn't follow our present day understanding of the definition of infection. For decades, scientists have argued against the infectious etiology (cause) of cancer, claiming that if it were an infection, it would spread like the common cold. I would argue that the word "infection" is only superficially understood today, just as the word "pleomorphism" is. Understand that while there exists antibiotics and antiviral drugs that absolutely kill infectious agents, the perfect antifungal does not exist, nor will it ever. To kill a fungal cell perfectly is to kill a human cell perfectly. Based on this fact, my interest lies in natural antifungal agents.

BioActive Nutrients has dedicated itself to the development of natural antifungal supplements. When taken with a diet meant to starve parasitic fungi, products like neem, apple cider vinegar, caprylic acid and grapefruit seed extract help many individuals begin to thrive after years of not knowing why they felt so bad. The company advises (and I agree) that medical advice should always be sought in advance of beginning an antifungal program. You should ask your doctors if you can try this simple, nontoxic, inexpensive approach if all else has failed you.

How powerful are non-prescriptive therapies? The scientific literature recently stated that the spice cinnamon was more effective than the prescription drug Diflucan in eradicating fungal cells. What an eye-opener that should be for all of us. It is my understanding that a specialized diet and natural supplements can do far more to help protect against breast cancer than anything else offered.

Visit Doug Kaufmann at www.KnowtheCause.com.